Press release on behalf of Anna Pickard.
Claims that I am a cynic, or that I have previously Been a cynic, have been widely reported in the tabloid media this week, alongside supposed ‘cynical’ text messages that I have apparently sent to certain people.
These claims are ludicrous, absurd, and unsubstantiated, and the parties claiming to have evidence of my alleged cynicism have no solid evidence to prove their case.
Because of this lack of evidence, I intend to sue all parties concerned, until they retract their allegations of cynicism, or manage to produce concrete evidence of their claims.
Now it’s not like me to write about David and Victoria Beckham, but I do find myself greatly amused by their current unhappinesses. Gosh that sounds awful. Who cares.
Basically, for anyone who hasn’t heard about this - and well done you, I can only assume you’re American - David Beckham, a not-bad footballer (soccer player) with a penchant for silly hairdos, is married to Victoria Beckham, a stick. Victoria used to be in the Spice girls, but isn’t anymore. That’s the kind of famous we’re talking about.
The British tabloid media believes that the Great British populace is obsessed with the Beckhams every twitch, which, and I can only speak for myself here, is utter bollocks. I really couldn’t give a monkey’s bell-end about the Beckhams.
Aaaaaaanyway.
There are allegations flying around the tabloid newspapers (henceforward referred to as the ’shit’ newspapers) from women claiming they’ve had flings, or affairs, or whatever, with David. I don’t know the terminology the shitpapers used, I assume perhaps that he was accused of having ‘knobbed’ them, or alleged to have enjoyed some extra-marital ‘biffing’.
David and Victoria meanwhile, on the well-dressed side of stressed, beautifully pale and serious looking and lapping up the publicity, have appeared many many times, and said very little.
When they have talked about the allegations, and I refer to David in particular, they have called them ‘ludicrous’, ’shocking’, ‘absurd’ and ‘unsubstantiated’.
Not once have the allegations been called ‘untrue’ by the couple.
A lot of words have been used, the most serious, I suppose, being ‘unsubstantiated’ which, in this context it would seem, means ‘you haven’t got the evidence to back this up’.
I just get a little suspicious, I suppose, when all that is required in a situation is to say;
‘No, I didn’t do it, these allegations are untrue, completely false, I have never cheated on my wife, ever.’
And instead, you use every other word you can think of but never deny that it happened.
Because if you actually denied it, then at some point you’d have to admit that you lied.
If it’s true, which, let’s face it, it probably is.
People cheat on each other, it just happens.
Call me a cynic, but it’s true.
I just wish they wouldn’t lie so much about it.
And I wish, oh how I wish, that tv and magazines and shitpapers wouldn’t presume that I need to be deluged with information about someone who kicks for a living deciding to put his willy in one rich stick rather than another rich stick.
Because I don’t.
I really, really don’t.